<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cubase vs. Logic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://earpick.wordpress.com/2007/04/14/cubase-vs-logic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://earpick.wordpress.com/2007/04/14/cubase-vs-logic/</link>
	<description>is taking pictures and making tunes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:13:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: spinnerama</title>
		<link>http://earpick.wordpress.com/2007/04/14/cubase-vs-logic/#comment-2942</link>
		<dc:creator>spinnerama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 02:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earpick.wordpress.com/2007/04/14/cubase-vs-logic/#comment-2942</guid>
		<description>Some very interesting points of view.  I have been using Cubase AI4 for the past few months on a PC.  Although it isn&#039;t a full version of Cubase, it does allow me to do some things that I can&#039;t do with having nothing.  I&#039;ve used Cubase many years ago on a Mac and it worked fine.  But that was even before they started recording audio.  I&#039;ve even used Notator on an Atari 1040 if anyone remembers that.

I am now in the market for an upgrade from the AI4 and am trying to decide between Logic and Cubase full version.  The cost for the Logic will be considerable because I don&#039;t have a Mac.  That being said I will spend the money if Logic is the way to go.  Reading thru peoples responses it seems that it may be.  

My question, does anyone know a site to compare &quot;stats&quot; between the 2 programs?

Also, besides plug-ins....what other features does Logic excel on?

Hopefully someone can help me out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some very interesting points of view.  I have been using Cubase AI4 for the past few months on a PC.  Although it isn&#8217;t a full version of Cubase, it does allow me to do some things that I can&#8217;t do with having nothing.  I&#8217;ve used Cubase many years ago on a Mac and it worked fine.  But that was even before they started recording audio.  I&#8217;ve even used Notator on an Atari 1040 if anyone remembers that.</p>
<p>I am now in the market for an upgrade from the AI4 and am trying to decide between Logic and Cubase full version.  The cost for the Logic will be considerable because I don&#8217;t have a Mac.  That being said I will spend the money if Logic is the way to go.  Reading thru peoples responses it seems that it may be.  </p>
<p>My question, does anyone know a site to compare &#8220;stats&#8221; between the 2 programs?</p>
<p>Also, besides plug-ins&#8230;.what other features does Logic excel on?</p>
<p>Hopefully someone can help me out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zerstoerer</title>
		<link>http://earpick.wordpress.com/2007/04/14/cubase-vs-logic/#comment-2939</link>
		<dc:creator>Zerstoerer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earpick.wordpress.com/2007/04/14/cubase-vs-logic/#comment-2939</guid>
		<description>I use both - Cubase 4 and Logic 8 - Cubase has some very importend festurer, e.g. mixer maps, very helbful for external gear - Logic is great for mixing, the plugs are just bombastic  - its not a cheap solution, but i see it as aninvestement in the future, you never know which daw will have a sudden death, great article , thanks z</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use both &#8211; Cubase 4 and Logic 8 &#8211; Cubase has some very importend festurer, e.g. mixer maps, very helbful for external gear &#8211; Logic is great for mixing, the plugs are just bombastic  &#8211; its not a cheap solution, but i see it as aninvestement in the future, you never know which daw will have a sudden death, great article , thanks z</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jpt</title>
		<link>http://earpick.wordpress.com/2007/04/14/cubase-vs-logic/#comment-2929</link>
		<dc:creator>jpt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 03:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earpick.wordpress.com/2007/04/14/cubase-vs-logic/#comment-2929</guid>
		<description>All - as I am shopping for a Mac (Mac Mini) DAW, and trying to compare the two DAW&#039;s in question here, this was a great source of comparisons. What I wanted to know, just having gotten onto Mac, is: has the Mac/Logic audio quality improved with the more updated versions of Logic and/or Mac OSX? I&#039;m particularly interested in the audio side, as I do almost all &quot;live&quot; guitar, etc, and using DOD drum files. Give me the scoop. Cheers, jt, Simi Valley CA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All &#8211; as I am shopping for a Mac (Mac Mini) DAW, and trying to compare the two DAW&#8217;s in question here, this was a great source of comparisons. What I wanted to know, just having gotten onto Mac, is: has the Mac/Logic audio quality improved with the more updated versions of Logic and/or Mac OSX? I&#8217;m particularly interested in the audio side, as I do almost all &#8220;live&#8221; guitar, etc, and using DOD drum files. Give me the scoop. Cheers, jt, Simi Valley CA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Logic Lover</title>
		<link>http://earpick.wordpress.com/2007/04/14/cubase-vs-logic/#comment-2906</link>
		<dc:creator>Logic Lover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 23:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earpick.wordpress.com/2007/04/14/cubase-vs-logic/#comment-2906</guid>
		<description>Hi to the creator of this blog. I have never seen a comparison as such in years between Logic and Cubase and I dont think I would bother even looking for another as I know the answer. Logic is for me and I am for Logic. I began with Cubase for a year or two. But then immediately changed to Logic. Since then Logic has been my main Arranging, sequencing, MIDI and Audio software. I have used it for many things apart from Music Production. 

It not just with Logic, but with any software any one begins with, they get used to it. All the shortcuts, the tricks and techniques. However, if someone wants to use Cubase they can, we aint stopping them. But no one can stop me from using Logic.

I used to think twice about going back to Cubase. Why? because I thought that the interface, the graphics look more real to Analogue or Hardware equipment in a studio. Such as mixers and rack modules etc. Though there are many software that have these advanced graphics. They may help by giving you a fresh newer and cleaner look, but is the quality the same? One person mentioned above about some functions in Cubase such as Warp Grid, Audio Quantization and Macros etc. Well, using Logic myself, I began discovering things. I am ok with editing MIDI, the built in synths and virtual instruments are amazing, not only they have presets, but you can re-model them to your liking or even start from scratch.

You can edit MIDI using Hyper-Draw, Its also useful if you want to have a particulat MIDI part fading in and out or variating in volume, pitch, modulation and other changes.

Finding the tempo is not a problem in Logic. Use your brain. I was a DJ in my early years. I still do to promote my music. Having that skill of changing the tempo on the fly while a loop is in cycle mode, i can find the exact tempo until it sounds smooth. other than that, there are ways that Logic allows you to find the tempo. I also have a third party plug-in that allows me to sense a loops tempo. After setting that tempo, if it is slightly of quant, then you can adjust it by using the re-groove function by doubling clicking the audio region and using the drop down menus there. There are many things you can do. It not what the software can do, its about what you can do with the software.

As for the Macros, again not a problem. When you double click a MIDI part, it shows the Piano Roll with the timeline/bars with a grid (Im sure you all know what I mean). There you have your notes inputted. If you want to move one note, say for e.g. the C to a C#, all you do is click the wrong note you have inputted on the left (on the Piano Keys), it then selects the whole line of notes, then you click + Hold and Click + Drag to the desired note, C# in this case. Other way is to press and hold the shift key and click individual notes that need to be transposed, then release the shift key, and click and drag the notes to desired note. It is much easier than opening up a box that you try and program to make changes. Its more hands on and you know exactly what you are doing with your notes. The rest is dependant on your ear, if you know how the notes should sound.

Anyway, theres so much we could discuss. I dont have much time, and im sure others do not want to waste time. Please use what you want, but I personally think Logic is the way forward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi to the creator of this blog. I have never seen a comparison as such in years between Logic and Cubase and I dont think I would bother even looking for another as I know the answer. Logic is for me and I am for Logic. I began with Cubase for a year or two. But then immediately changed to Logic. Since then Logic has been my main Arranging, sequencing, MIDI and Audio software. I have used it for many things apart from Music Production. </p>
<p>It not just with Logic, but with any software any one begins with, they get used to it. All the shortcuts, the tricks and techniques. However, if someone wants to use Cubase they can, we aint stopping them. But no one can stop me from using Logic.</p>
<p>I used to think twice about going back to Cubase. Why? because I thought that the interface, the graphics look more real to Analogue or Hardware equipment in a studio. Such as mixers and rack modules etc. Though there are many software that have these advanced graphics. They may help by giving you a fresh newer and cleaner look, but is the quality the same? One person mentioned above about some functions in Cubase such as Warp Grid, Audio Quantization and Macros etc. Well, using Logic myself, I began discovering things. I am ok with editing MIDI, the built in synths and virtual instruments are amazing, not only they have presets, but you can re-model them to your liking or even start from scratch.</p>
<p>You can edit MIDI using Hyper-Draw, Its also useful if you want to have a particulat MIDI part fading in and out or variating in volume, pitch, modulation and other changes.</p>
<p>Finding the tempo is not a problem in Logic. Use your brain. I was a DJ in my early years. I still do to promote my music. Having that skill of changing the tempo on the fly while a loop is in cycle mode, i can find the exact tempo until it sounds smooth. other than that, there are ways that Logic allows you to find the tempo. I also have a third party plug-in that allows me to sense a loops tempo. After setting that tempo, if it is slightly of quant, then you can adjust it by using the re-groove function by doubling clicking the audio region and using the drop down menus there. There are many things you can do. It not what the software can do, its about what you can do with the software.</p>
<p>As for the Macros, again not a problem. When you double click a MIDI part, it shows the Piano Roll with the timeline/bars with a grid (Im sure you all know what I mean). There you have your notes inputted. If you want to move one note, say for e.g. the C to a C#, all you do is click the wrong note you have inputted on the left (on the Piano Keys), it then selects the whole line of notes, then you click + Hold and Click + Drag to the desired note, C# in this case. Other way is to press and hold the shift key and click individual notes that need to be transposed, then release the shift key, and click and drag the notes to desired note. It is much easier than opening up a box that you try and program to make changes. Its more hands on and you know exactly what you are doing with your notes. The rest is dependant on your ear, if you know how the notes should sound.</p>
<p>Anyway, theres so much we could discuss. I dont have much time, and im sure others do not want to waste time. Please use what you want, but I personally think Logic is the way forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: earpick</title>
		<link>http://earpick.wordpress.com/2007/04/14/cubase-vs-logic/#comment-2903</link>
		<dc:creator>earpick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 16:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earpick.wordpress.com/2007/04/14/cubase-vs-logic/#comment-2903</guid>
		<description>You don&#039;t have to tell me brother -- I completely switched to logic since writing this and absolutely adore it. can&#039;t live without it. I&#039;m getting a little sick of Apple but Logic is what keeps me on the platform heh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don&#8217;t have to tell me brother &#8212; I completely switched to logic since writing this and absolutely adore it. can&#8217;t live without it. I&#8217;m getting a little sick of Apple but Logic is what keeps me on the platform heh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://earpick.wordpress.com/2007/04/14/cubase-vs-logic/#comment-2902</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 16:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earpick.wordpress.com/2007/04/14/cubase-vs-logic/#comment-2902</guid>
		<description>Logic pro 8 is aboustley amazing - for audio and midi to many people think cubase is &#039;amazing&#039; when its not.
Apart from the way it looks, the plug-ins and virtual instruments are so bad its funny, its so complicated to do simple things, when your on logic it&#039;s nice to be in and you like to be on it :) 
and the things you get with logic 8!!!
soundtrack,mainstage(wow)logic pro 8,all the jam packs.... what do you get with cubase which is even more expensive!! 

I produce backing tracks for companies (theatre sort of songs) and i have various kontakt plugins and i use lots of exs24 and it&#039;s just brilliant. The things you can do on logic are so much better than Cubase, i could go on forever saying how much better logic is, i have cubase on my PC and its aboustley terrible compared to what i can do on logic pro 8, Protools is better than cubase anythings better than cubase, garageband is better!! i would buy a mac just for garageband if i had the money (thats how i started off) i bought an EMAC just for garageband from ebay.

And the fact you can sample your own sounds in logic and just do anything you want!! it&#039;s not stopped me from doing anything i want so far,
just little things for e.g like 
i was making a song the other day which i had a sample of a cymbal crash (this is audio now) and i wanted to have this cymbal crash every so often, so i just copied it (apple C) and then while the song was playing!! i pasted it at the right time (Apple V) at the right timing in the song, and did that for every beat and it kept up with me and actually let me do it,
if i attempted anything like that in cubase it would crash or not let me do it!!
so much things logic does are so much better, and i think logic and protools ARE the best to work with.

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Logic pro 8 is aboustley amazing &#8211; for audio and midi to many people think cubase is &#8216;amazing&#8217; when its not.<br />
Apart from the way it looks, the plug-ins and virtual instruments are so bad its funny, its so complicated to do simple things, when your on logic it&#8217;s nice to be in and you like to be on it :)<br />
and the things you get with logic 8!!!<br />
soundtrack,mainstage(wow)logic pro 8,all the jam packs&#8230;. what do you get with cubase which is even more expensive!! </p>
<p>I produce backing tracks for companies (theatre sort of songs) and i have various kontakt plugins and i use lots of exs24 and it&#8217;s just brilliant. The things you can do on logic are so much better than Cubase, i could go on forever saying how much better logic is, i have cubase on my PC and its aboustley terrible compared to what i can do on logic pro 8, Protools is better than cubase anythings better than cubase, garageband is better!! i would buy a mac just for garageband if i had the money (thats how i started off) i bought an EMAC just for garageband from ebay.</p>
<p>And the fact you can sample your own sounds in logic and just do anything you want!! it&#8217;s not stopped me from doing anything i want so far,<br />
just little things for e.g like<br />
i was making a song the other day which i had a sample of a cymbal crash (this is audio now) and i wanted to have this cymbal crash every so often, so i just copied it (apple C) and then while the song was playing!! i pasted it at the right time (Apple V) at the right timing in the song, and did that for every beat and it kept up with me and actually let me do it,<br />
if i attempted anything like that in cubase it would crash or not let me do it!!<br />
so much things logic does are so much better, and i think logic and protools ARE the best to work with.</p>
<p>:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaz</title>
		<link>http://earpick.wordpress.com/2007/04/14/cubase-vs-logic/#comment-2898</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earpick.wordpress.com/2007/04/14/cubase-vs-logic/#comment-2898</guid>
		<description>Cubase 5 is awesome. Stable, feature rich, and works lovely with my UAD cards. 

I was a LONG time Logic user. I switched to Cubase not because I wasn&#039;t happy with Logic, but because I wasn&#039;t willing to spend a few grand on a new computer just to keep running Logic. I have never looked back. 

Truth be told, when I switched to Cubase many years ago...I felt like I was giving up some functionality. I was using Cakewalk before Logic...and Logic just felt like &quot;grown man&quot; software. 

I think Cubase has come of age as of version 4. 

Still...I wrote some great songs with Logic back in the day....shedding a tear now. 

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cubase 5 is awesome. Stable, feature rich, and works lovely with my UAD cards. </p>
<p>I was a LONG time Logic user. I switched to Cubase not because I wasn&#8217;t happy with Logic, but because I wasn&#8217;t willing to spend a few grand on a new computer just to keep running Logic. I have never looked back. </p>
<p>Truth be told, when I switched to Cubase many years ago&#8230;I felt like I was giving up some functionality. I was using Cakewalk before Logic&#8230;and Logic just felt like &#8220;grown man&#8221; software. </p>
<p>I think Cubase has come of age as of version 4. </p>
<p>Still&#8230;I wrote some great songs with Logic back in the day&#8230;.shedding a tear now. </p>
<p>:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: earpick</title>
		<link>http://earpick.wordpress.com/2007/04/14/cubase-vs-logic/#comment-2880</link>
		<dc:creator>earpick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 07:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earpick.wordpress.com/2007/04/14/cubase-vs-logic/#comment-2880</guid>
		<description>Since writing this article I have switched to Logic entirely. Gotta write up another one. 

By the way, the entire site has moved to http://earpick.cubicfruit.com - this blog hasn&#039;t been updated with new articles for a while now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since writing this article I have switched to Logic entirely. Gotta write up another one. </p>
<p>By the way, the entire site has moved to <a href="http://earpick.cubicfruit.com" rel="nofollow">http://earpick.cubicfruit.com</a> &#8211; this blog hasn&#8217;t been updated with new articles for a while now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MUZICPHILES</title>
		<link>http://earpick.wordpress.com/2007/04/14/cubase-vs-logic/#comment-2879</link>
		<dc:creator>MUZICPHILES</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 05:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earpick.wordpress.com/2007/04/14/cubase-vs-logic/#comment-2879</guid>
		<description>hi,
i like your article

i not a  great fan of mac softwares.
i love logic for the plugins though..
but if you have a good set of plugins.. i don&#039;t think one will look at using logic as a daw as
it does not have the powerful features that cubase offers..
a few drawbacks on logic i felt were.
1]a mono view of a stereo waveform
2]no lane editing in midi veiw[acc to your article]
3]no offline processing

these are very important editing and processing functions which i need on daily basis.. maybe it is a part of my workflow and you may bave a workabout in logic..but then these features lack.
apart from that.. can you tell me what are the equivalents of ..
the 
1]logical editor of cubase ? 
2]macro function
3]unattended midi to audio rendering[with a third party app by phil pendlebury]
4]warp grid
5]audio quantize and taking quantize from an audio clip

p.s -as far as the workspaces are concerned they are mapped on alt+1,2,3..
i think they work fine .. maybe a stolen concept from logic but it works well here..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi,<br />
i like your article</p>
<p>i not a  great fan of mac softwares.<br />
i love logic for the plugins though..<br />
but if you have a good set of plugins.. i don&#8217;t think one will look at using logic as a daw as<br />
it does not have the powerful features that cubase offers..<br />
a few drawbacks on logic i felt were.<br />
1]a mono view of a stereo waveform<br />
2]no lane editing in midi veiw[acc to your article]<br />
3]no offline processing</p>
<p>these are very important editing and processing functions which i need on daily basis.. maybe it is a part of my workflow and you may bave a workabout in logic..but then these features lack.<br />
apart from that.. can you tell me what are the equivalents of ..<br />
the<br />
1]logical editor of cubase ?<br />
2]macro function<br />
3]unattended midi to audio rendering[with a third party app by phil pendlebury]<br />
4]warp grid<br />
5]audio quantize and taking quantize from an audio clip</p>
<p>p.s -as far as the workspaces are concerned they are mapped on alt+1,2,3..<br />
i think they work fine .. maybe a stolen concept from logic but it works well here..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: earpick</title>
		<link>http://earpick.wordpress.com/2007/04/14/cubase-vs-logic/#comment-2876</link>
		<dc:creator>earpick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 00:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earpick.wordpress.com/2007/04/14/cubase-vs-logic/#comment-2876</guid>
		<description>You got it. So, sorry if you&#039;re a girl, you&#039;ll just have to use FruityLoops =))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You got it. So, sorry if you&#8217;re a girl, you&#8217;ll just have to use FruityLoops =))</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
